Definitely something to ponder ... for those who care to take the time.

Please ponder this, if you were fortunate enough to realize the dream.  You now have enough money to retire and let someone else handle your money and estate.  Who would you pick to manage those affairs? 

Would you blindly pick someone who has had very little experience?  Even if that person could say all the right things to your face?  No, not likely.  You'd carefully select someone who themselves has demonstrated they can be trusted to protect your interests and wealth.

Would you pick someone associated with thugs, crooks and swindlers?  Probably not.  Even if they were only thugs from the neighborhood or work, you certainly beg questioning good judgment, plus you could losing your money and resources on their interests - which may not coincide with yours.

I could go on, but I believe you get the point.  There is so much factual, provable evidence in similar regard related to Mr. Obama that I have to ask... why are you wanting to put him in charge? 

1. He has no substantive experience to lead this great nation (in a time of crisis we need someone who has been there and already knows what to do);
   
2. His ideology has failed when it has been applied; He is associated with crooks and terrorists (this doesn't mean he is one, but it does means he lacks good judgment - you know, I really would like someone to lead our nation who possesses good judgment... call me picky.)
3. Even though he is a smooth talker, his story on key issues (most relating to values, taxes and foreign policy) has changed so many times, it certainly looks as though he has never really thought through these issues - or even may be changing the stance based on who he's talking to (like everyone is stupid.)

Are we doomed if he gets in office?  No.  But, the damage done can be huge - especially when you realize that the foreign policies of capitulation he espouses yielded 911 (let me know if you need timelines) and the Supreme Court Justices he will pick will have a pro-abortion stance.  Let me ask... when did you become you?  Were you you as a teen?  Yep.  Were you you as a toddler?  Yep.  Were you you when first born?  Yep.  Were you you moments before when you were in the womb?  How about 3 or 6 months prior to popping out of the womb?  You know, it was you all along.  You were the person from conception and had you been aborted, you would not be here today. 

Anyway, enough pause for pondering on my ramblings.  Check out the associations of Obama below.

Thanks.


Lee

--------------------------------------
Something New Here
Radical? Check. Tied to ACORN? Check. Redistributionist? Check.

By Stanley Kurtz

During his first campaign for the Illinois
state senate in 1995-96, Barack Obama was a member of, and was endorsed
by, the far-left New Party. Obama’s New Party ties give the lie to his
claim to be a post-partisan, post-ideological pragmatist. Particularly
in Chicago, the New Party functioned as the electoral arm of the
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). So
despite repeated attempts to distance himself from ACORN, Obama’s New
Party ties raise disturbing questions about his links to those proudly
militant leftists. The media’s near-total silence on this critical
element of Obama’s past is deeply irresponsible

Socialist?  Something New Here by Stanley Kurtz on National Review Online